I have always been a defensive low-scoring, grit-and-grind type staff. The cards to make those groups are high tier cards. It's been harder over the years because, honestly, when 2K releases cards they simply appear to be a league better than year-old cards if they have similar badges / total overall. However, apart from that NBA 2K MT MyTEAM is more than simply"use expensive players such as OOP Durant at PG." I mean, don't get me wrong, it's nice to get OOP Durant but not for this price as you would need to spend real life cash and get lucky ripping open packs.
A team plan and A playbook can go along way. You like. Like, I like Curry and other 3 pt players but I am not going to sit there and take 40 3's at NBA 2K even though it is going to get me the dub since that quite frankly is SO boring. I have personally taken the approach to actually place my lockdown defense as starters, together with my scorers. Yeah I have trouble when I run into 3-5MM + MT teams operating BUT I can ALWAYS compete together. My point is, you and I agree, be your own man.
My favorite part about myteam is the freedom in creating your own basketball strategy, and the cancerous playerbase greening 3's destroyed it out of half court each possession. If you wanna do that take that shit I only need to play basketball. I wish there was a sensible solution to this. When I first got NBA 2K I loathed it on the point where I uninstalled it because it's so unrealistic. I needed to suck it up because there is no other option. I truly believe EA is capable of making a basketball game that is competitive but they are fuckin around.
People follow what that man says way. People have different play styles and different dribble combos some cards are gon na be a fit that is better then others and they use in 2K. At the day's end, he is just another dude who plays with 2K, he is not all-knowing. Before there was a clear reply to the question which is better in the 2. Because there were not that numerous elite 2s, so he's easily among the very best choice for 2, but1s are stacked with the y’all motherfuckers, placing T-Mac there is obviously a waste when he isn't likely to be running the ground as well as a point guard lebron(since he actually don't have the very best sigs). But with many elite 2s you will find, now, there is actually no reason why playing with with him is better.
See and that I get that but it is the men and women who dismiss him and stage playing with that I find bothersome. A bunch of top 10 lists have been made here lately and they say he is"not a PG". But I mean he's. That's literally the primary position of the card. For me I run Kawhi and GOAT Jordan at the 2. Therefore it wouldn't make sense for me to run him there. It is not the difference of view I have a problem with nba2king, it is the lack of reasoning behind having the difference of view, from people who have used never used either TMac. I know most individuals don't know the things are the way that they say they're. Prolly do perform NBA 2K enough to truly feel that. But I am one of the ones that need my point shield cross but he's neither or to have either a fantastic btb and don't see him because I am a cheeseball.
